`#!/bin/tcsh`

set n = 128

set beta = `echo "(-0.6)*($n)*($n)" | bc -l`

set ppn = 16

set np = 31

set nodes = `echo "if ($np%$ppn==0) {$np/$ppn;} else {$np/$ppn+1}" | bc`

]]>

]]>

]]>

So here is the story. I have an output file test.o1551739 which contains lines such as “iter = 125” scattering everywhere. I need to get the sum of all the numbers in these lines. How can I achieve this without writing a program? The following is a little thought process.

First, I am so used to `grep`

that I can grab all such lines by doing:

`grep iter test.o1551739`

Then, use `sed`

to get rid of the suffix “iter = “:

`sed s/"iter = "//`

Now that I have a bunch of numbers, one in a line. How can I sum them up? Yah, here comes the usage of `paste`

. The command `paste`

allows me to merge the lines and put a delimiter in between. I chose to use the plus sign, because then it gives me an arithmetic expression. Try this:

`paste -sd+`

Once I have the arithmetic expression, I’ll just use `bc`

to calculate the result. So piping all these steps, here is the one line command:

`grep iter test.o1551739 | sed s/"iter = "// | paste -sd+ | bc`

Nice. I realize that there must be tons of ways to do the same job. But I really love my solution.

]]>

`cases`

environment defined by the amsmath package sets each case to be inline math style. This will look ugly when the formulas in the cases are complicated, such as fractions or integrals. Consider the following sample code:

`\usepackage{amsmath}`

\[

f(x)=

\begin{cases}

\frac{1}{2(x-1)}, & x>1 \\

\frac{\Gamma(x)}{2^{x-1}}, & 0<x<1

\end{cases}

\]

The result looks like this:

The solution is to use the `dcases`

environment provided by the mathtools package instead. The prefix `d’ means `display’. It will set the cases in displayed math style (exactly the same as `\frac`

versus `\dfrac`

). So if we write the following code

`\usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}`

\[

f(x)=

\begin{dcases}

\frac{1}{2(x-1)}, & x>1 \\

\frac{\Gamma(x)}{2^{x-1}}, & 0<x<1

\end{dcases}

\]

then we will see the result which looks like this:

]]>

Many fantastic PSTricks examples.

]]>

Let the characteristic polynomial of a matrix be

Then the coefficients can be computed by

To prove the formula, note that the coefficient is the summation of all possible products of j eigenvalues, i.e.,

where denotes the j-combination of numbers from 1 to n, and the trace of is the sum of the th power of the eigenvalues, i.e.,

In addition, we have

The above indicates that the first part of cancels the second part of , whereas the second part of cancels the first part of The rest of proof becomes obvious now.

]]>

`publish`

, that helps you do all these in a simpler way.
In a nutshell, the way to use `publish`

is to first type in the texts (as your usually LaTeX editing), including Matlab codes, in a single `.m`

file. Let’s say the file name is `example.m`

. Then, in Matlab, you issue the command

`publish('example.m', struct('format','latex','outputDir','ltx-src'));`

It means that you want Matlab to process `example.m`

and output a LaTeX file `example.tex`

(that you can compile to get pdf) in the sub-directory `ltx-src`

. This is it. Instead of writing `example.tex`

, you write a file `example.m`

.

So, how should I write `example.m`

? It is best to give an example. See the following:

`%%`

% <latex>

% The eigenvalues of a circulant matrix can be

% obtained by performing FFT on the first column

% of the matrix. First, let us construct a

% $5\times5$ circulant matrix \verb|C| whose first

% column \verb|c| is generated with random input:

% </latex>

`c = rand(5,1);`

% sad that Matlab does not provide a circulant()

% command...

C = toeplitz(c, c([1 end:-1:2]))

`%%`

% <latex>

% The eigenvalues of \verb|C| are nothing but

% </latex>

`lambda = fft(c)`

`%%`

% <latex>

% Check it out! The output is the same as using

% the \verb|eig| command:

% </latex>

`eig(C)`

`%%`

% Fun, isn't it?

It is nothing but a script file that Matlab can execute, right? The trick part is that all the texts and LaTeX markups are buried in comment blocks. How the Matlab command `publish`

makes a LaTeX output is that whenever it meets a whole block of comments starting with ‘`%%`

‘, it strips the comment signs and decorates the whole block using the pair `\begin{par}`

and `\end{par}`

. On the other hand, whenever it meets a block of codes that does not start with ‘`%%`

‘, Matlab knows that they are executable commands. Matlab uses `\begin{verbatim}`

and `\end{verbatim}`

to typeset these command texts, and automatically add the Matlab outputs of the commands, which are also decorated by the `\begin{verbatim}`

and `\end{verbatim}`

pair, in the LaTeX file. Something I am not satisfied is that Matlab does not recognize LaTeX commands such as `\verb||`

. I have to put `<latex></latex>`

so that Matlab can do a verbatim copy of `\verb||`

, instead of expand the text `\verb||`

in some weird way, in the output LaTeX file.

It is time to try the above example yourself. Have fun.

]]>

`/* File: t1.c */`

#include

`void foo(double *a)`

{

a[0] = 1;

}

`void main(void)`

{

double a[2] = {0};

foo(a);

printf("first element of array a = %g\n", a[0]);

}

`% File: t2.m`

function t2()

`a = zeros(2,1);`

foo(a);

fprintf(1, 'first element of array a = %g\n', a(1));

`function foo(a)`

`a(1) = 1;`

`% File: t3.m`

function t3()

`a = zeros(2,1);`

foo_mex(a);

fprintf(1, 'first element of array a = %g\n', a(1));

`/* File: foo_mex.c */`

#include "mex.h"

`void mexFunction(int nlhs, mxArray *plhs[], int nrhs, const mxArray *prhs[])`

{

double *a = mxGetPr(prhs[0]);

a[0] = 1;

}

]]>

`function y = f(x)`

y1 = x.* (x<0);

y2 = x.^2 .* (x>=0) .* (x<2);

y3 = 4 .* (x>=2);

y = y1 + y2 + y3;

]]>